Yesterday, I had the chance to speak with Mark Bauerlein, author of “The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future (Or, Don’t Trust Anyone Under 30).” He has been the subject of several previous posts and I thought it necessary to present you with some of his thoughts and opinions.

Professor Mark Bauerlein
1. Why did you first become interested in this topic (generation Y and the impact of a technology overload)?
“Well, when I was at the National Endowment for the Arts, we did a study eventually entitled “Reading at Risk.” It got a lot of attention, and I hit the road to speak about the results, the main one of which is that leisure reading by young-uns is way down.”
(Learn more about “Reading at Risk”)
2. Could you provide any first-hand experience/account that prompted you to take on this concept?
“You watch and listen over the years, and you see and hear different things. Stand in a quad between classes and watch how many students pass by with a cell phone to their ears or in front of their eyes. Go into a cafe and count the laptops on the tables, then compare it to the number of books being read. Go to the library and count the kids at computer terminals, than go up to the stacks and search for any of them. We all see the trend, but only a curmudgeonly reactionary will see the terrible cost.”
3. In your opinion, is Generation Y truly in danger? If so, to what extent? What do we loose by overusing technology?
“Sure they are. They spend far too much of their formative years texting, networking, photoshopping...These are the only years in which they will read books, look at great art, and face challenging ideas as an educational experience. They’ll never get this chance again. Instead of going to the cafe to update facebook, they should head to their professor’s office for a chat about Lady Macbeth. Instead of doing 2272 messages a month (Nielsen rating from last January), they should read about Gettysburg or Tet. Get a little learning while you can. If you don’t, you enter your thirties a lesser citizen and a lesser person.”
4. Could you be more specific? When members of Gen Y choose to text instead of talk, or browse the Internet instead of read, what are they losing?
It is a matter of citizenship: democracy puts a heavy burden of knowledge on people. Totalitarian governments don’t–on the contrary, the more ignorance the better for them. Democracy makes people into decision-makers, voting, protesting, and lobbying… And if they are going to do so responsibly, they must bear an awareness of the Bill of Rights, the great examples from the past (heroes and villains), the principles of liberty, free speech etc., Supreme Court decisions, and so on. If people don’t keep history and civics close at hand, they end up operating out of selfish and consumerist interests. They respond to political candidates on shallow grounds. They make fundamental mistakes such as believing George W. Bush to be a conservative. Now, civicm and historical knowledge is largely gained in high school and college years. If those matters are not reflected in their leisure lives, they won’t pursue them out of school (by reading about the Civil War) and they won’t remember them once they’ve left civics class. It has no personal meaning, so once the paper is done and the test taken, it disappears.”
5. What would you say is a healthy amount of time for teens to spend on the Internet/on social networking sites?
“Let’s put it another way. I have a 4-year old boy. If I get a solid hour of reading time and a good hour of talking time (cultivating his opinions, memories, judgments…not just “did you have fun today?”) and see him outside playing for another two hours, I don’t mind if he had an hour of TV and some web browsing later on. It’s all a question of balance. Just remember, though, that TV and web don’t want to share a child’s attention with books and play. Ratings are everything.”
6. Are there any solutions to this problem that you see among teens today?
“Not on any broad level, only at the individual level of parents, teachers, and other mentors in kids’ lives pulling them out of the technology/social circuit for a few hours each day. Let them know that there are bigger heroes in life than the popular crowd, that the triumphs of adolescence don’t mean much later on.”
7. Who do you feel is to blame?
“My generation. My colleagues gave up on general education and core knowledge, preferring to substitute child-centered learning and self-esteem building for genuine instruction. They lost faith in a tradition of history and literature and civics that everyone had to know because that tradition bore racist and sexist elements. And they didn’t want to grow old, so they don’t like to play the role of the stern elder to the young. But that role is essential to help the young grow up. Without it, they keep their adolescence long past age 20.”
Recent Comments